On Thu, 2014-11-27 at 17:26 -0800, Soren Brinkmann wrote:
> Instead of the driver caring about implementation details like device
> tree, just provide information about driver specific pinconf parameters
> to pinconf-generic which takes care of parsing the DT.
>
> Signed-off-by: Soren Brinkmann brinkmann at xilinx.com>
> ---
> This is compile tested only. So, it's likely that it needs more tweaking
> to make it actually work on HW. But it illustrates the potential
> benefits of the pinconf-generic changes in this series.
> ---
> drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-spmi-gpio.c | 125 +++----------------------------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 114 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-spmi-gpio.c b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-spmi-gpio.c
> index b863b5080890..2db85e53ef73 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-spmi-gpio.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-spmi-gpio.c
> @@ -131,14 +131,14 @@ struct pmic_gpio_state {
> struct gpio_chip chip;
> };
>
> -struct pmic_gpio_bindings {
> - const char*property;
> - unsigned param;
> +static const struct pinconf_generic_dt_params pmic_gpio_bindings[] = {
> + {"qcom,pull-up-strength",PMIC_GPIO_CONF_PULL_UP,0},
> + {"qcom,drive-strength",PMIC_GPIO_CONF_STRENGTH,0},
> };
>
> -static struct pmic_gpio_bindings pmic_gpio_bindings[] = {
> - {"qcom,pull-up-strength",PMIC_GPIO_CONF_PULL_UP},
> - {"qcom,drive-strength",PMIC_GPIO_CONF_STRENGTH},
> +static const struct pin_config_item pmic_conf_items[] = {
> + PCONFDUMP(PMIC_GPIO_CONF_PULL_UP, "pull-up-strength", NULL, true),
s/pull-up-strength/qcom,pull-up-strength/
> + PCONFDUMP(PMIC_GPIO_CONF_STRENGTH, "drive-strength", NULL, true),
> };
>
I am not happy that we have to define the same think two times.
Regards,
Ivan
