On 10/02/2025 14:14, Thierry Bultel wrote: > On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 07:28:58PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 29/01/2025 17:37, Thierry Bultel wrote: > > Hi Krzyztof, > >>> Add RZ/T2H (R9A09G077) and variants in documentation. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Thierry Bultel <thierry.bultel.yh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> .../devicetree/bindings/soc/renesas/renesas.yaml | 8 ++++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/renesas/renesas.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/renesas/renesas.yaml >>> index b7acb65bdecd..33f9e37a3d3d 100644 >>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/renesas/renesas.yaml >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/renesas/renesas.yaml >>> @@ -535,6 +535,14 @@ properties: >>> - renesas,r9a09g057h44 # RZ/V2HP with Mali-G31 + Mali-C55 support >>> - const: renesas,r9a09g057 >>> >>> + - description: RZ/T2H (R9A09G077) >>> + items: >>> + - enum: >>> + - renesas,r9a09g077 # RZ/T2H with Quad Cortex-A55 + Dual Cortex-R52 >>> + - renesas,r9a09g077m04 # RZ/T2H with Single Cortex-A55 + Dual Cortex-R52 - no security >>> + - renesas,r9a09g077m24 # RZ/T2H with Dual Cortex-A55 + Dual Cortex-R52 - no security >>> + - renesas,r9a09g077m44 # RZ/T2H with Quad Cortex-A55 + Dual Cortex-R52 - no security >> >> 1. Never tested (see writing schema). >> 2. I don't quite get what this is supposed to express. There is no board >> here. > > I had split the commit this way intentionally, this one documenting jsut > the SoC, and a later one documenting its evaluation board. This does not help. You cannot test it, it won't work or it will be a noop. Don't split commits just to have more commits. They must have a meaning. > So you would prefer to have as single commit for SoC (and all variants) > and the evaluation board ? There is no commit here for SoC, so obviously this must be squashed with the board compatible commit. Best regards, Krzysztof
