On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 07:28:58PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 29/01/2025 17:37, Thierry Bultel wrote: Hi Krzyztof, > > Add RZ/T2H (R9A09G077) and variants in documentation. > > > > Signed-off-by: Thierry Bultel <thierry.bultel.yh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > .../devicetree/bindings/soc/renesas/renesas.yaml | 8 ++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/renesas/renesas.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/renesas/renesas.yaml > > index b7acb65bdecd..33f9e37a3d3d 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/renesas/renesas.yaml > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/renesas/renesas.yaml > > @@ -535,6 +535,14 @@ properties: > > - renesas,r9a09g057h44 # RZ/V2HP with Mali-G31 + Mali-C55 support > > - const: renesas,r9a09g057 > > > > + - description: RZ/T2H (R9A09G077) > > + items: > > + - enum: > > + - renesas,r9a09g077 # RZ/T2H with Quad Cortex-A55 + Dual Cortex-R52 > > + - renesas,r9a09g077m04 # RZ/T2H with Single Cortex-A55 + Dual Cortex-R52 - no security > > + - renesas,r9a09g077m24 # RZ/T2H with Dual Cortex-A55 + Dual Cortex-R52 - no security > > + - renesas,r9a09g077m44 # RZ/T2H with Quad Cortex-A55 + Dual Cortex-R52 - no security > > 1. Never tested (see writing schema). > 2. I don't quite get what this is supposed to express. There is no board > here. I had split the commit this way intentionally, this one documenting jsut the SoC, and a later one documenting its evaluation board. So you would prefer to have as single commit for SoC (and all variants) and the evaluation board ? Best regards Thierry > > Best regards, > Krzysztof
