> If you guys feel that you can explain the algorithm you're employing > in a half-VGA-screen comment, it would be the best choice, and that's > enough. I agree that in-kernel would be super-great to have. On the other hand, I especially liked the *detailed* explanation of different approaches on this website. Which is helpful for users wondering if they can use the new generic helper even though the algorithm they want to replace looks different. Yet, this is not half a VGA-screen. > If it's impossible or you think that external reference is really needed, > I trust you. But please refer the original source. In this case, it's: > > Warren, H. S. (2013). Hacker’s Delight (2nd ed), page 97. I decided against this reference. It is a great book, but why pay bucks when there is freely available information for just this one topic. Besides, the book is a collection of algorithms and references other sources for this implementation as well. Maybe as a second reference? > If you think that pointing to a web-page with nice summary to the topic > is helpful - please do. And if you would like to cache the link - I've > got nothing against it - as soon as you commit to maintain those links > up-to-date in the kernel sources. Sure, yet then I would prefer the wayback-machine link and have this patch accepted.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
