> Is the plan to replace all weblinks by webarchive links as a precaution? Dunno if there is a plan but 'git grep' showed at least a trend. > Even websites backed by big companies may disappear[1]... I think you are comparing apples with oranges here. The main site (intel.com) still exists last time I checked. > Putting the webarchive link here also impacts the funloop.org server > statistics, downplaying its relevance, and possibly even causing an > earlier shutdown. Could be. But could also be the opposite: not using an alternative will eat all the traffic and increase maintenance duty, so it will be shut down because of too much work. Who has the better crystal ball? > The URL can always be updated when the original site disappears. Still, the good thing is that the site is *now* backed by the Wayback Machine. I needed to request the backup because I wanted the link. That all being said, I don't care much which link we use. I just wanted to address review comments.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
