Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: dts: renesas: add proper node names to (L)BSC devices

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Geert,

thanks for the review!

> The "@<unit-address>" part is optional.

Ah! Then, I actually prefer dropping the unit address.

> Actually, I cannot find that in the DT spec, only:
> 
>    "If the node has no reg property, the @unit-address must be omitted".

Sounds good to me. However, sh73a0 and r8a73a4 are still a bit strange.
They have a unit-address because they have a reg-property which is
documented for renesas,bsc. However, there is no driver for the BSC.
AFAICS, this could work as well with "simple-pm-bus" and we could drop
the renesas,bsc bindings? This probably is a separate issue, though.

Happy hacking,

   Wolfram

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux