On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 12:43 PM Wolfram Sang
<wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Rob,
>
> thanks for the super-fast review!
>
> > > "smbus_alert" is a generic interrupt name for controllers, so document
> > > it. Introduce also "irq" for the primary interrupt.
> >
> > I wouldn't add "irq". It's kind of odd in that we have it for I2C
> > devices in the first place and we don't try to do that anywhere else.
>
> Yes, I am actually happy to remove "irq". I only added it for
> consistency.
>
> > > + interrupt-names:
> > > + anyOf:
> > > + - {} # Any name is allowed.
> > > + - items:
> > > + enum:
> > > + - irq
> > > + - smbus_alert
> >
> > It doesn't really matter with the {}, but the 2nd entry is only true
> > if interrupt-names only contains these 2 names. I'd use 'contains'
> > rather than 'items' here.
>
> So, just replace "items:" with "contains:", right? Should I also change
> this for I2C targets and add this chunk to patch 2?
Oh, I missed that you just copied that, but yes, if you can update
that one too, it would be good.
Rob
