Hi Biju,
On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 2:00 PM Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Also, I am planning to replace pm_runtime_enable(), pm_runtime_resume_and_get()
> with devm_clk_enabled() to simplify the probe()/remove() as separate patch.
> I guess it is ok to you??
I don't think that is a good idea, as it will cause breakage when
extending PM Domain support on RZ/G2L (and RZ/G3S?).
BTW, devm_pm_runtime_enable() does exist,
devm_pm_runtime_resume_and_get() doesn't yet.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
