From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
The order of function calls in the disable operation should be the reverse
of that in the enable operation. Thus, reorder the function calls to first
disable the parent IRQ chip before disabling the TINT IRQ.
Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/irqchip/irq-renesas-rzg2l.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-renesas-rzg2l.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-renesas-rzg2l.c
index 861a0e5a3e97..693ff285ca2c 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-renesas-rzg2l.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-renesas-rzg2l.c
@@ -271,8 +271,8 @@ static void rzg2l_tint_irq_endisable(struct irq_data *d, bool enable)
static void rzg2l_irqc_irq_disable(struct irq_data *d)
{
- rzg2l_tint_irq_endisable(d, false);
irq_chip_disable_parent(d);
+ rzg2l_tint_irq_endisable(d, false);
}
static void rzg2l_irqc_irq_enable(struct irq_data *d)
--
2.34.1
