Re: [net-next 3/6] ravb: Create helper to allocate skb and align it

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 27/02/2024 01:40, Niklas Söderlund wrote:
> The RAVB device requires the SKB data to be aligned to 128 bytes. The
> alignment is done by allocating a skb 128 bytes larger than the maximum
> frame size supported by the device and adjusting the headroom to fit the
> requirement.
> 
> This code has been refactored a few times and small issues have been
> added along the way. The issues are not harmful but prevents merging
> parts of the Rx code which have been split in two implementations with
> the addition of RZ/G2L support, a device that supports larger frame
> sizes.
> 
> This change removes the need for duplicated and somewhat inaccurate
> hardware alignment constrains stored in the hardware information struct
> by creating a helper to handle the allocation of a skb and alignment of
> a skb data.
> 
> For the R-Car class of devices the maximum frame size is 4K and each
> descriptor is limited to 2K of data. The current implementation does not
> support split descriptors, this limits the frame size to 2K. The
> current hardware information however records the descriptor size just
> under 2K due to bad understanding of the device when larger MTUs where
> added.
> 
> For the RZ/G2L device the maximum frame size is 8K and each descriptor
> is limited to 4K of data. The current hardware information records this
> correctly, but it gets the alignment constrains wrong as just aligns it
> by 128, it does not extend it by 128 bytes to allow the full frame to be
> stored. This works because the RZ/G2L device supports split descriptors
> and allocates each skb to 8K and aligns each 4K descriptor in this
> space.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

After some discussion with Niklas on IRC, I'm dropping my NACK so that
this can hopefully get in to v6.9. I'll have to re-do some of my work,
but it was unlikely that would be ready to go in for v6.9 anyway. So,
here's some review...

> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h      |  1 -
>  drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c | 41 +++++++++++++-----------
>  2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h
> index 7f9e8b2c012a..751bb29cd488 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h
> @@ -1057,7 +1057,6 @@ struct ravb_hw_info {
>  	netdev_features_t net_hw_features;
>  	netdev_features_t net_features;
>  	int stats_len;
> -	size_t max_rx_len;
>  	u32 tccr_mask;
>  	u32 rx_max_frame_size;
>  	unsigned aligned_tx: 1;
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
> index 3c59e2c317c7..6e39d498936f 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
> @@ -113,12 +113,21 @@ static void ravb_set_rate_rcar(struct net_device *ndev)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -static void ravb_set_buffer_align(struct sk_buff *skb)
> +static struct sk_buff *
> +ravb_alloc_skb(struct net_device *ndev, const struct ravb_hw_info *info)

This function should take an extra `gfp_t gfp_mask` argument since it is
called from two contexts: RX ring initialization where we want regular
allocation, and RX ring refill where we need atomic allocation.

>  {
> -	u32 reserve = (unsigned long)skb->data & (RAVB_ALIGN - 1);
> +	struct sk_buff *skb;
> +	u32 reserve;
>  
> +	skb = netdev_alloc_skb(ndev, info->rx_max_frame_size + RAVB_ALIGN - 1);

Call __netdev_alloc_skb() instead with the gfp_mask argument.

> +	if (!skb)
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	reserve = (unsigned long)skb->data & (RAVB_ALIGN - 1);
>  	if (reserve)
>  		skb_reserve(skb, RAVB_ALIGN - reserve);
> +
> +	return skb;
>  }
>  
>  /* Get MAC address from the MAC address registers
> @@ -251,7 +260,7 @@ static void ravb_rx_ring_free_gbeth(struct net_device *ndev, int q)
>  				       le32_to_cpu(desc->dptr)))
>  			dma_unmap_single(ndev->dev.parent,
>  					 le32_to_cpu(desc->dptr),
> -					 GBETH_RX_BUFF_MAX,
> +					 priv->info->rx_max_frame_size,
>  					 DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
>  	}
>  	ring_size = sizeof(struct ravb_rx_desc) * (priv->num_rx_ring[q] + 1);
> @@ -276,7 +285,7 @@ static void ravb_rx_ring_free_rcar(struct net_device *ndev, int q)
>  				       le32_to_cpu(desc->dptr)))
>  			dma_unmap_single(ndev->dev.parent,
>  					 le32_to_cpu(desc->dptr),
> -					 RX_BUF_SZ,
> +					 priv->info->rx_max_frame_size,
>  					 DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
>  	}
>  	ring_size = sizeof(struct ravb_ex_rx_desc) *
> @@ -342,7 +351,7 @@ static void ravb_rx_ring_format_gbeth(struct net_device *ndev, int q)
>  		rx_desc = &priv->rx_ring[q].desc[i];
>  		rx_desc->ds_cc = cpu_to_le16(GBETH_RX_DESC_DATA_SIZE);
>  		dma_addr = dma_map_single(ndev->dev.parent, priv->rx_skb[q][i]->data,
> -					  GBETH_RX_BUFF_MAX,
> +					  priv->info->rx_max_frame_size,
>  					  DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
>  		/* We just set the data size to 0 for a failed mapping which
>  		 * should prevent DMA from happening...
> @@ -372,7 +381,7 @@ static void ravb_rx_ring_format_rcar(struct net_device *ndev, int q)
>  		rx_desc = &priv->rx_ring[q].ex_desc[i];
>  		rx_desc->ds_cc = cpu_to_le16(RX_BUF_SZ);
>  		dma_addr = dma_map_single(ndev->dev.parent, priv->rx_skb[q][i]->data,
> -					  RX_BUF_SZ,
> +					  priv->info->rx_max_frame_size,
>  					  DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
>  		/* We just set the data size to 0 for a failed mapping which
>  		 * should prevent DMA from happening...
> @@ -476,10 +485,9 @@ static int ravb_ring_init(struct net_device *ndev, int q)
>  		goto error;
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < priv->num_rx_ring[q]; i++) {
> -		skb = __netdev_alloc_skb(ndev, info->max_rx_len, GFP_KERNEL);
> +		skb = ravb_alloc_skb(ndev, info);

Add GFP_KERNEL as the gfp_mask argument.

>  		if (!skb)
>  			goto error;
> -		ravb_set_buffer_align(skb);
>  		priv->rx_skb[q][i] = skb;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -805,7 +813,8 @@ static struct sk_buff *ravb_get_skb_gbeth(struct net_device *ndev, int entry,
>  	skb = priv->rx_skb[RAVB_BE][entry];
>  	priv->rx_skb[RAVB_BE][entry] = NULL;
>  	dma_unmap_single(ndev->dev.parent, le32_to_cpu(desc->dptr),
> -			 ALIGN(GBETH_RX_BUFF_MAX, 16), DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
> +			 ALIGN(priv->info->rx_max_frame_size, 16),
> +			 DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
>  
>  	return skb;
>  }
> @@ -912,13 +921,12 @@ static bool ravb_rx_gbeth(struct net_device *ndev, int *quota, int q)
>  		desc->ds_cc = cpu_to_le16(GBETH_RX_DESC_DATA_SIZE);
>  
>  		if (!priv->rx_skb[q][entry]) {
> -			skb = netdev_alloc_skb(ndev, info->max_rx_len);
> +			skb = ravb_alloc_skb(ndev, info);

Add GFP_ATOMIC as the gfp_mask argument.

>  			if (!skb)
>  				break;
> -			ravb_set_buffer_align(skb);
>  			dma_addr = dma_map_single(ndev->dev.parent,
>  						  skb->data,
> -						  GBETH_RX_BUFF_MAX,
> +						  priv->info->rx_max_frame_size,
>  						  DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
>  			skb_checksum_none_assert(skb);
>  			/* We just set the data size to 0 for a failed mapping
> @@ -992,7 +1000,7 @@ static bool ravb_rx_rcar(struct net_device *ndev, int *quota, int q)
>  			skb = priv->rx_skb[q][entry];
>  			priv->rx_skb[q][entry] = NULL;
>  			dma_unmap_single(ndev->dev.parent, le32_to_cpu(desc->dptr),
> -					 RX_BUF_SZ,
> +					 priv->info->rx_max_frame_size,
>  					 DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
>  			get_ts &= (q == RAVB_NC) ?
>  					RAVB_RXTSTAMP_TYPE_V2_L2_EVENT :
> @@ -1028,10 +1036,9 @@ static bool ravb_rx_rcar(struct net_device *ndev, int *quota, int q)
>  		desc->ds_cc = cpu_to_le16(RX_BUF_SZ);
>  
>  		if (!priv->rx_skb[q][entry]) {
> -			skb = netdev_alloc_skb(ndev, info->max_rx_len);
> +			skb = ravb_alloc_skb(ndev, info);


Add GFP_ATOMIC as the gfp_mask argument.

>  			if (!skb)
>  				break;	/* Better luck next round. */
> -			ravb_set_buffer_align(skb);
>  			dma_addr = dma_map_single(ndev->dev.parent, skb->data,
>  						  le16_to_cpu(desc->ds_cc),
>  						  DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
> @@ -2682,7 +2689,6 @@ static const struct ravb_hw_info ravb_gen3_hw_info = {
>  	.net_hw_features = NETIF_F_RXCSUM,
>  	.net_features = NETIF_F_RXCSUM,
>  	.stats_len = ARRAY_SIZE(ravb_gstrings_stats),
> -	.max_rx_len = RX_BUF_SZ + RAVB_ALIGN - 1,
>  	.tccr_mask = TCCR_TSRQ0 | TCCR_TSRQ1 | TCCR_TSRQ2 | TCCR_TSRQ3,
>  	.rx_max_frame_size = SZ_2K,
>  	.internal_delay = 1,
> @@ -2708,7 +2714,6 @@ static const struct ravb_hw_info ravb_gen2_hw_info = {
>  	.net_hw_features = NETIF_F_RXCSUM,
>  	.net_features = NETIF_F_RXCSUM,
>  	.stats_len = ARRAY_SIZE(ravb_gstrings_stats),
> -	.max_rx_len = RX_BUF_SZ + RAVB_ALIGN - 1,
>  	.tccr_mask = TCCR_TSRQ0 | TCCR_TSRQ1 | TCCR_TSRQ2 | TCCR_TSRQ3,
>  	.rx_max_frame_size = SZ_2K,
>  	.aligned_tx = 1,
> @@ -2731,7 +2736,6 @@ static const struct ravb_hw_info ravb_rzv2m_hw_info = {
>  	.net_hw_features = NETIF_F_RXCSUM,
>  	.net_features = NETIF_F_RXCSUM,
>  	.stats_len = ARRAY_SIZE(ravb_gstrings_stats),
> -	.max_rx_len = RX_BUF_SZ + RAVB_ALIGN - 1,
>  	.tccr_mask = TCCR_TSRQ0 | TCCR_TSRQ1 | TCCR_TSRQ2 | TCCR_TSRQ3,
>  	.rx_max_frame_size = SZ_2K,
>  	.multi_irqs = 1,
> @@ -2756,7 +2760,6 @@ static const struct ravb_hw_info gbeth_hw_info = {
>  	.net_hw_features = NETIF_F_RXCSUM | NETIF_F_HW_CSUM,
>  	.net_features = NETIF_F_RXCSUM | NETIF_F_HW_CSUM,
>  	.stats_len = ARRAY_SIZE(ravb_gstrings_stats_gbeth),
> -	.max_rx_len = ALIGN(GBETH_RX_BUFF_MAX, RAVB_ALIGN),
>  	.tccr_mask = TCCR_TSRQ0,
>  	.rx_max_frame_size = SZ_8K,
>  	.aligned_tx = 1,

Looks ok other than the above comments. I'll try to do some testing
tomorrow.

Thanks,

-- 
Paul Barker

Attachment: OpenPGP_0x27F4B3459F002257.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux