On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 02:02:12PM +0000, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 02:55:50PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > @@ -768,6 +768,7 @@ struct phy_device {
> > >
> > > /* Generic phy_device::dev_flags */
> > > #define PHY_F_NO_IRQ 0x80000000
> > > +#define PHY_F_RXC_ALWAYS_ON BIT(30)
> >
> > It is a bit odd mixing 0x numbers and BIT() macros for the same class
> > of thing. I would use 0x40000000, or convert PHY_F_NO_IRQ to BIT(31)
>
> If I used 0x40000000, there would be review comments suggesting the use
> of BIT(). Can't win!
No, you cannot win, but at least it would be consistent :-)
Andrew
