Re: [PATCH] spi: sh-msiof: avoid integer overflow in constants

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Wolfram,

On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 2:40 PM Wolfram Sang
<wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > But they don't match, so we can't unify them?
> >
> > I stand corrected...
>
> So, the patch is good as-is?

Yeah...
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>

Still, it might make sense to apply the same change to the
SIFCTR_RFWM_* definitions.  However, that would still leave us with
inconsistencies with other bitfield definitions in the file...

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux