> > > +/* > > > + * Device Tree Source for the White Hawk Single board > > > > Maybe add "R-Car V4H" here? Maybe even "Rev 2.0"? > > The existing r8a779g0-white-hawk.dts does not have such a comment. > Perhaps it should be added, too? I think so. I mean, the whole point of the series is to make white-hawk includes independent. I'd conclude that the actual users of the includes should specify which SoC this instance incorporates.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature