RE: [PATCH v16 3/4] pwm: Add support for RZ/G2L GPT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Krzysztof Kozlowski,

Thanks for the feedback.

> Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 3/4] pwm: Add support for RZ/G2L GPT
> 
> On 04/10/2023 13:14, Biju Das wrote:
> 
> ...
> > +	ret = clk_rate_exclusive_get(rzg2l_gpt->clk);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		goto err_clk_disable;
> > +
> > +	rzg2l_gpt->rate = clk_get_rate(rzg2l_gpt->clk);
> > +	if (!rzg2l_gpt->rate) {
> > +		dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, -EINVAL, "gpt clk rate is 0");
> 
> ret = dev_err_probe
> 
> Otherwise you return success.

Agreed.

> 
> > +		goto err_clk_rate_put;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Refuse clk rates > 1 GHz to prevent overflow later for computing
> > +	 * period and duty cycle.
> > +	 */
> > +	if (rzg2l_gpt->rate > NSEC_PER_SEC) {
> > +		ret = -EINVAL;
> > +		goto err_clk_rate_put;
> > +	}
> > +
> ....
> 
> > +	rzg2l_gpt->chip.ops = &rzg2l_gpt_ops;
> > +	rzg2l_gpt->chip.npwm = RZG2L_MAX_PWM_CHANNELS;
> > +	ret = devm_pwmchip_add(&pdev->dev, &rzg2l_gpt->chip);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret, "failed to add PWM
> chip\n");
> > +
> > +	pm_runtime_idle(&pdev->dev);
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +
> > +err_clk_rate_put:
> > +	clk_rate_exclusive_put(rzg2l_gpt->clk);
> > +err_clk_disable:
> > +	clk_disable_unprepare(rzg2l_gpt->clk);
> > +err_reset:
> > +	reset_control_assert(rzg2l_gpt->rstc);
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct of_device_id rzg2l_gpt_of_table[] = {
> > +	{ .compatible = "renesas,rzg2l-gpt", },
> > +	{ /* Sentinel */ }
> > +};
> > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, rzg2l_gpt_of_table);
> > +
> > +static struct platform_driver rzg2l_gpt_driver = {
> > +	.driver = {
> > +		.name = "pwm-rzg2l-gpt",
> > +		.pm = pm_ptr(&rzg2l_gpt_pm_ops),
> > +		.of_match_table = rzg2l_gpt_of_table,
> > +	},
> > +	.probe = rzg2l_gpt_probe,
> > +};
> > +module_platform_driver(rzg2l_gpt_driver);
> > +
> > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>");
> > +MODULE_ALIAS("platform:pwm-rzg2l-gpt");
> 
> You should not need MODULE_ALIAS() in normal cases. If you need it, usually
> it means your device ID table is wrong.

OK, I will drop it.

I am waiting for review comments from others.

I will send V16 along with their comments if any.

Cheers,
Biju




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux