[PATCH v2 RFT] clk: renesas: rcar-gen3: Extend SDnH divider table

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

The clock dividers might be used with clock stop bit enabled or not.
Current tables only support recommended values from the datasheet. This
might result in warnings like below because no valid clock divider is
found. Resulting in a 0 divider.

There are Renesas ARM Trusted Firmware version out there which e.g.
configure 0x201 (shifted logical right by 2: 0x80) and with this match
the added { STPnHCK | 0, 1 }:

https://github.com/renesas-rcar/arm-trusted-firmware/blob/rcar_gen3_v2.3/drivers/renesas/rcar/emmc/emmc_init.c#L108

------------[ cut here ]------------
sd1h: Zero divisor and CLK_DIVIDER_ALLOW_ZERO not set
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 1 at drivers/clk/clk-divider.c:141 divider_recalc_rate+0x48/0x70
Modules linked in:
CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.1.52 #1
Hardware name: Custom board based on r8a7796 (DT)
pstate: 40000005 (nZcv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
pc : divider_recalc_rate+0x48/0x70
...
------------[ cut here ]------------

Fixes: bb6d3fa98a41 ("clk: renesas: rcar-gen3: Switch to new SD clock handling")
Signed-off-by: Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
[wsa: extended the table to 5 entries, added comments, reword commit message a little]
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

After some discussion on IRC, Geert and I concluded that Dirk's approach
is good but we wanted to extend it to all 5 possibilities. Also,
comments explaining the situation. I added these. It works on my Ebisu
board (R-Car E3). Dirk, could you kindly test on your system?

 drivers/clk/renesas/rcar-cpg-lib.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/renesas/rcar-cpg-lib.c b/drivers/clk/renesas/rcar-cpg-lib.c
index e2e0447de190..b1d9a9a55569 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/renesas/rcar-cpg-lib.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/renesas/rcar-cpg-lib.c
@@ -70,8 +70,20 @@ void cpg_simple_notifier_register(struct raw_notifier_head *notifiers,
 #define STPnHCK	BIT(9 - SDnSRCFC_SHIFT)
 
 static const struct clk_div_table cpg_sdh_div_table[] = {
-	{ 0, 1 }, { 1, 2 }, { STPnHCK | 2, 4 }, { STPnHCK | 3, 8 },
-	{ STPnHCK | 4, 16 }, { 0, 0 },
+	/*
+	 * These values are recommended by the datasheet. Because they come
+	 * first, Linux will only use these.
+	 */
+	{ 0, 1 }, { 1, 2 }, { STPnHCK | 2, 4 }, { STPnHCK | 3, 8 }, { STPnHCK | 4, 16 },
+	/*
+	 * These values are not recommended because STPnHCK is wrong. But they
+	 * have been seen because of broken firmware. So, we support reading
+	 * them but Linux will sanitize them when initializing through
+	 * recalc_rate.
+	 */
+	{ STPnHCK | 0, 1 }, { STPnHCK | 1, 2 },  { 2, 4 }, { 3, 8 }, { 4, 16 },
+	/* Sentinel */
+	{ 0, 0 }
 };
 
 struct clk * __init cpg_sdh_clk_register(const char *name,
-- 
2.30.2




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux