Hi Sergei. On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 10:43 AM Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 7/12/23 11:14 AM, Conor Dooley wrote: > > > dtbs_check w/ W=1 complains: > > Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /soc/ethernet@11c20000/ethernet-phy@7: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property > > Warning (avoid_unnecessary_addr_size): /soc/ethernet@11c20000: unnecessary #address-cells/#size-cells without "ranges" or child "reg" property > > > > The ethernet@11c20000 node is guarded by an `#if (!SW_ET0_EN_N)` in > > rzg2ul-smarc-som.dtsi, where the phy child node is added. In > > rzfive-smarc-som.dtsi, the ethernet node is marked disabled & the > > interrupt properties are deleted from the phy child node. As a result, > > the produced dts looks like: > > ethernet@11c20000 { > > compatible = "renesas,r9a07g043-gbeth\0renesas,rzg2l-gbeth"; > > /* snip */ > > #address-cells = <0x01>; > > #size-cells = <0x00>; > > status = "disabled"; > > > > ethernet-phy@7 { > > }; > > }; > > > > Adding a corresponding `#if (!SW_ET0_EN_N)` around the node in > > rzfive-smarc-som.dtsi avoids the complaint, as the empty child node is > > not added: > > ethernet@11c20000 { > > compatible = "renesas,r9a07g043-gbeth\0renesas,rzg2l-gbeth"; > > /* snip */ > > #address-cells = <0x01>; > > #size-cells = <0x00>; > > status = "disabled"; > > }; > > > > Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > [...] > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/renesas/rzfive-smarc-som.dtsi b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/renesas/rzfive-smarc-som.dtsi > > index d6f18754eb5d..c62debc7ca7e 100644 > > --- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/renesas/rzfive-smarc-som.dtsi > > +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/renesas/rzfive-smarc-som.dtsi > > @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ &dmac { > > status = "disabled"; > > }; > > > > +#if (!SW_ET0_EN_N) > > Are the parens really needed here? No they aren't. But this follows the existing style of the other users. > > > ð0 { > > status = "disabled"; > > > [...] Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds