On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 10:15 AM Conor Dooley
<conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> dtbs_check w/ W=1 complains:
> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /soc/ethernet@11c20000/ethernet-phy@7: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property
> Warning (avoid_unnecessary_addr_size): /soc/ethernet@11c20000: unnecessary #address-cells/#size-cells without "ranges" or child "reg" property
>
> The ethernet@11c20000 node is guarded by an `#if (!SW_ET0_EN_N)` in
> rzg2ul-smarc-som.dtsi, where the phy child node is added. In
> rzfive-smarc-som.dtsi, the ethernet node is marked disabled & the
> interrupt properties are deleted from the phy child node. As a result,
> the produced dts looks like:
> ethernet@11c20000 {
> compatible = "renesas,r9a07g043-gbeth\0renesas,rzg2l-gbeth";
> /* snip */
> #address-cells = <0x01>;
> #size-cells = <0x00>;
> status = "disabled";
>
> ethernet-phy@7 {
> };
> };
>
> Adding a corresponding `#if (!SW_ET0_EN_N)` around the node in
> rzfive-smarc-som.dtsi avoids the complaint, as the empty child node is
> not added:
> ethernet@11c20000 {
> compatible = "renesas,r9a07g043-gbeth\0renesas,rzg2l-gbeth";
> /* snip */
> #address-cells = <0x01>;
> #size-cells = <0x00>;
> status = "disabled";
> };
>
> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
i.e. will queue in renesas-devel for v6.6.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
