Re: [PATCH RFC 4/6] dt-bindings: rtc: isl1208: Document built-in RTC device on PMIC RAA215300

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Biju,

On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 12:08 PM Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 4/6] dt-bindings: rtc: isl1208: Document built-in
> > RTC device on PMIC RAA215300
> > On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 10:46 AM Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > The Built-in RTC device found on PMIC RAA215300 is similar to the
> > > isl1208 IP. However, RTC is enabled by PMIC RAA215300 and the polarity
> > > of the external oscillator is determined by the PMIC revision.
> > >
> > > Document renesas,raa215300-isl1208 compatible and
> > > renesas,raa215300-pmic property to handle these differences.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  .../devicetree/bindings/rtc/isil,isl1208.yaml       | 13 +++++++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/isil,isl1208.yaml
> > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/isil,isl1208.yaml
> > > index 04d51887855f..888a832ed1db 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/isil,isl1208.yaml
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/isil,isl1208.yaml
> > > @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ properties:
> > >            - isil,isl1209
> > >            - isil,isl1218
> > >            - isil,isl1219
> > > +          - renesas,raa215300-isl1208
> >
> > That sounds a bit over-complicated.
> > What about just "renesas,raa215300-rtc"?
>
> OK, good to me.
>
> > If you consider them sufficiently compatible, you could add "isil,isl1208"
> > as a fallback.
>
> The pmic has to enable RTC block to make it functional.
> The registers and functionality are compatible.
> But the configuration of Oscillator polarity is different on PMIC version.
> So we need to handle it here.
>
> You mean like below?
>
> +      - items:
> +          - enum:
> +              - renesas, raa215300-rtc
> +          - const: isil,isl1208

That's indeed what I meant.  But given the inverted osc bit, I think the
fallback is not appropriate.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux