RE: [PATCH v4 5/6] serial: 8250_em: Use pseudo offset for UART_FCR

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Ilpo,

Thanks for the feedback.

> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/6] serial: 8250_em: Use pseudo offset for UART_FCR
> 
> On Fri, 17 Feb 2023, Biju Das wrote:
> 
> > UART_FCR shares the same offset with UART_IIR. We cannot use UART_FCR
> > in serial8250_em_serial_in() as it overlaps with UART_IIR.
> >
> > This patch introduces a macro UART_FCR_EM with a high value to avoid
> > overlapping with existing UART_* register defines.
> >
> > This will help us to use UART_FCR_EM consistently in serial8250_em_
> > serial{_in/_out} function to read/write FCR register.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Suggested-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > v4:
> >  * New patch. Used UART_FCR_EM for read/write of FCR register.
> > ---
> >  drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_em.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_em.c
> > b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_em.c
> > index 499d7a8847ec..4165fd3bb17a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_em.c
> > +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_em.c
> > @@ -19,6 +19,13 @@
> >  #define UART_DLL_EM 9
> >  #define UART_DLM_EM 10
> >
> > +/*
> > + * A high value for UART_FCR_EM avoids overlapping with existing
> > +UART_*
> > + * register defines. UART_FCR_EM_HW is the real HW register offset.
> > + */
> > +#define UART_FCR_EM 0x10003
> > +#define UART_FCR_EM_HW 3
> > +
> >  struct serial8250_em_priv {
> >  	int line;
> >  };
> > @@ -29,12 +36,14 @@ static void serial8250_em_serial_out(struct uart_port
> *p, int offset, int value)
> >  	case UART_TX: /* TX @ 0x00 */
> >  		writeb(value, p->membase);
> >  		break;
> > -	case UART_FCR: /* FCR @ 0x0c (+1) */
> 
> 8250_port wants this to remain in place, I think. Otherwise it's attempts to
> set UART_FCR will end up into wrong destination.

Oops, next patch has this change.

+	case UART_FCR:
+		serial8250_em_reg_update(p, UART_FCR_EM, value);

I just need to keep UART_FCR for this patch and 
remove it from "serial8250_em_serial_out_helper" on the next patch

Cheers,
Biju


> 
> --
>  i.
> 
> 
> >  	case UART_LCR: /* LCR @ 0x10 (+1) */
> >  	case UART_MCR: /* MCR @ 0x14 (+1) */
> >  	case UART_SCR: /* SCR @ 0x20 (+1) */
> >  		writel(value, p->membase + ((offset + 1) << 2));
> >  		break;
> > +	case UART_FCR_EM:
> > +		writel(value, p->membase + (UART_FCR_EM_HW << 2));
> > +		break;
> >  	case UART_IER: /* IER @ 0x04 */
> >  		value &= 0x0f; /* only 4 valid bits - not Xscale */
> >  		fallthrough;
> > @@ -54,6 +63,8 @@ static unsigned int serial8250_em_serial_in(struct
> uart_port *p, int offset)
> >  	case UART_MSR: /* MSR @ 0x1c (+1) */
> >  	case UART_SCR: /* SCR @ 0x20 (+1) */
> >  		return readl(p->membase + ((offset + 1) << 2));
> > +	case UART_FCR_EM:
> > +		return readl(p->membase + (UART_FCR_EM_HW << 2));
> >  	case UART_IER: /* IER @ 0x04 */
> >  	case UART_IIR: /* IIR @ 0x08 */
> >  	case UART_DLL_EM: /* DLL @ 0x24 (+9) */
> >




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux