Re: [PATCH 1/4] clk: rs9: Check for vendor/device ID

[Marek Vasut <marex@xxxxxxx>]

On 1/4/23 11:27, Alexander Stein wrote:

[...]

> > > +		dev_err(&client->dev,
> >
> > return dev_err_probe() might work better here ?
>
> How? This error branch always returns -ENODEV, so no deferred probing will
> occur at all.

It's not about deferred probing, just that you wouldn't have two lines 
of dev_err() + return -ENODEV, but just one return dev_err_probe() line.