Hi Conor, On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 12:40 AM Conor Dooley <mail@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 15/09/2022 23:26, Lad, Prabhakar wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 10:36 PM <Conor.Dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On 15/09/2022 19:15, Prabhakar wrote: > >>> riscv: boot: dts: r9a07g043: Add placeholder nodes > >>> From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>> Add empty placeholder nodes to RZ/Five (R9A07G043) SoC DTSI. > >> Can you explain why do you need placeholder nodes for this and > >> cannot just directly include the other dtsis? > >> > > Since the RZ/G2UL SoC is ARM64 where it has a GIC and on RZ/Five SoC > > we have PLIC for interrupts. Also the interrupt numbering for RZ/Five > > SoC differs from RZ/G2UL SoC hence we are not directly using the > > RZ/G2UL SoC DTSI [0]. > > > > [0] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g043.dtsi?h=v6.0-rc5 > > > > For the RZ/Five SMARC EVK I am re-using the below files [1] (SoM) and > > [2] (Carrier board) as the RZ/Five SMARC EVK is pin compatible. Since > > I am re-using these when trying to compile the RZ/Five DTB I get > > compilation errors since the nodes dont exist (and there is no way > > currently we can delete the node reference when the actual node itself > > isn't present) hence these place holders. > > > > [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/rzg2ul-smarc-som.dtsi?h=v6.0-rc5 > > [2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/rzg2ul-smarc.dtsi?h=v6.0-rc5 > > If this method is acceptable to Geert, this explanation 100% needs to > go into the commit message. We've been using these placeholders a lot in Renesas SoC-specific .dtsi files, as they allow us to introduce gradually support for a new SoC that is mounted on an existing PCB, and thus shares a board-specific .dtsi file. Hence I'm fine with this. However, I think more properties can be dropped from the placeholders. There is no need to have e.g. 'reg-names' and 'status = "disabled"' (there is no compatible value, so no matching is done). Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
