Hi Prabhakar,
On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 3:06 PM Lad, Prabhakar
<prabhakar.csengg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 9:53 AM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 26, 2022 at 2:19 PM Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Sun, 26 Jun 2022 10:38:18 +0100,
> > > "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Jun 26, 2022 at 9:56 AM Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > On Sun, 26 Jun 2022 01:43:26 +0100,
> > > > > Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > > The Renesas RZ/Five SoC has a RISC-V AX45MP AndesCore with NCEPLIC100. The
> > > > > > NCEPLIC100 supports both edge-triggered and level-triggered interrupts. In
> > > > > > case of edge-triggered interrupts NCEPLIC100 ignores the next interrupt
> > > > > > edge until the previous completion message has been received and
> > > > > > NCEPLIC100 doesn't support pending interrupt counter, hence losing the
> > > > > > interrupts if not acknowledged in time.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > So the workaround for edge-triggered interrupts to be handled correctly
> > > > > > and without losing is that it needs to be acknowledged first and then
> > > > > > handler must be run so that we don't miss on the next edge-triggered
> > > > > > interrupt.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This patch adds a new compatible string for Renesas RZ/Five SoC and adds
> > > > > > support to change interrupt flow based on the interrupt type. It also
> > > > > > implements irq_ack and irq_set_type callbacks.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > > > > > + if (of_device_is_compatible(node, "renesas,r9a07g043-plic")) {
> > > > > > + priv->of_data = RENESAS_R9A07G043_PLIC;
> > > > > > + plic_chip.name = "Renesas RZ/Five PLIC";
> > > > >
> > > > > NAK. The irq_chip structure isn't the place for platform marketing.
> > > > > This is way too long anyway (and same for the edge version), and you
> > > > > even sent me a patch to make that structure const...
> > > > >
> > > > My bad will drop this.
> > >
> > > And why you're at it, please turn this rather random 'of_data' into
> > > something like:
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
> > > index bb87e4c3b88e..cd1683b77caf 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
> > > @@ -64,6 +64,10 @@ struct plic_priv {
> > > struct cpumask lmask;
> > > struct irq_domain *irqdomain;
> > > void __iomem *regs;
> > > + enum {
> > > + VANILLA_PLIC,
> > > + RENESAS_R9A07G043_PLIC,
> > > + } flavour;
> > > };
> > >
> > > struct plic_handler {
> > >
> > > to give some structure to the whole thing, because I'm pretty sure
> > > we'll see more braindead implementations as time goes by.
> >
> > What about using a feature flag (e.g. had_edge_irqs) instead?
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
> b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
> index 9f16833dcb41..247c3c98b655 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
> @@ -60,13 +60,13 @@
> #define PLIC_DISABLE_THRESHOLD 0x7
> #define PLIC_ENABLE_THRESHOLD 0
>
> +#define PLIC_QUIRK_EDGE_INTERRUPT BIT(0)
>
> struct plic_priv {
> struct cpumask lmask;
> struct irq_domain *irqdomain;
> void __iomem *regs;
> + u32 plic_quirks;
> };
>
> What about something like above?
LGTM.
Marc suggested to make this unsigned long, but TBH, that won't make
much of a difference. PLICs are present on RV32 SoCs, too, so you
cannot rely on having more than 32 bits anyway.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
