On 12/04/2022 12:17, Wolfram Sang wrote: > >> But that's not what happened. I even compared the assembler output of >> various solutions. > > I am sure you did. I just said "it looks like..." to state a reason why > I don't think it looks prettier. But this turns to bike-shedding for me, > just keep it if everyone else is happy. I vote for removal of ++, because later someone might wonder why it was incremented even if not used. Best regards, Krzysztof
