Hi Geert,
Thank you for the review.
On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 10:12 AM Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Prabhakar,
>
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 2:41 AM Lad Prabhakar
> <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > From: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > As per RZ/G2L HW manual (Rev.1.00 Sep, 2021) DEV_ID [31:28] indicates
> > product revision. Use this information to populate the revision info
> > for RZ/G2L family.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > v1->v2
> > * Fixed freeing up soc_dev_attr in error path.
>
> Thanks for the update!
>
> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
> i.e. will queue in renesas-devel for v5.18.
>
> > --- a/drivers/soc/renesas/renesas-soc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/soc/renesas/renesas-soc.c
> > @@ -405,41 +417,38 @@ static int __init renesas_soc_init(void)
> >
> > eshi = ((product >> 4) & 0x0f) + 1;
> > eslo = product & 0xf;
> > + soc_dev_attr->revision = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "ES%u.%u",
> > + eshi, eslo);
> > + } else if (id == &id_rzg2l) {
> > + eshi = ((product >> 28) & 0x0f);
> > + soc_dev_attr->revision = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "Rev %u",
> > + eshi);
>
> Would you mind if I would drop the "Rev " while applying?
>
Fine by me as it's already assigned to revision so there isn't any
point having "Rev" prepended to it.
Cheers,
Prabhakar
