Hi Sergei,
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 04/10] ravb: Add support for RZ/G2L SoC
>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10] ravb: Add support for RZ/G2L SoC
> >
> > On 10/1/21 6:06 PM, Biju Das wrote:
> >
> > > RZ/G2L SoC has Gigabit Ethernet IP consisting of Ethernet controller
> > > (E-MAC), Internal TCP/IP Offload Engine (TOE) and Dedicated Direct
> > > memory access controller (DMAC).
> > >
> > > This patch adds compatible string for RZ/G2L and fills up the
> > > ravb_hw_info struct. Function stubs are added which will be used by
> > > gbeth_hw_info and will be filled incrementally.
> >
> > I've always been against this patch -- we get a support for the
> > GbEther whihc doesn't work after this patch. I believe we should have
> > the GbEther support in the last patch. of the overall series.
>
>
> This is the common practice. We use bricks to build a wall. The function
> stubs are just Bricks.
>
> After filling stubs, we will add SoC dt and board DT, after that one will
> get GBsupport on RZ/G2L platform.
>
> Regards,
> Biju
>
> >
> > > Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Reviewed-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > RFC->v1:
> > > * Added compatible string for RZ/G2L.
> > > * Added feature bits max_rx_len, aligned_tx and tx_counters for
> RZ/G2L.
> > > ---
> > > drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h | 2 +
> > > drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c | 62
> > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 2 files changed, 64 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h
> > > b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h
> > > index c91e93e5590f..f6398fdcead2 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h
> > [...]
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
> > > b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
> > > index 8bf13586e90a..dc817b4d95a1 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
> > [...]
> > > @@ -2073,12 +2120,27 @@ static const struct ravb_hw_info
> > ravb_gen2_hw_info = {
> > > .nc_queue = 1,
> > > };
> > >
> > > +static const struct ravb_hw_info gbeth_hw_info = {
> > > + .rx_ring_free = ravb_rx_ring_free_gbeth,
> > > + .rx_ring_format = ravb_rx_ring_format_gbeth,
> > > + .alloc_rx_desc = ravb_alloc_rx_desc_gbeth,
> > > + .receive = ravb_rx_gbeth,
> > > + .set_rate = ravb_set_rate_gbeth,
> > > + .set_feature = ravb_set_features_gbeth,
> > > + .dmac_init = ravb_dmac_init_gbeth,
> > > + .emac_init = ravb_emac_init_gbeth,
> > > + .max_rx_len = GBETH_RX_BUFF_MAX + RAVB_ALIGN - 1,
> >
> > ALIGN(GBETH_RX_BUFF_MAX, RAVB_ALIGN)?
Will send this change as RFC.
Regards,
Biju
> >
> > > + .aligned_tx = 1,
> > > + .tx_counters = 1,
> > > +};
> > > +
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > MBR. Sergey
