Hello Geert, On Thu, Jul 01, 2021 at 01:41:19PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 12:45 PM Uwe Kleine-König > <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > his for-next branch is based on v5.13-rc1 and there are no changes in it > > touching drivers/pwm/core.c, so I expect this to be fine. > > Git tends to disagree: > > $ git log --oneline v5.13-rc1..pwm/for-next -- drivers/pwm/core.c > 9ae241d06ef7aca8 pwm: core: Simplify some devm_*pwm*() functions > c333b936c1530e76 pwm: core: Remove unused devm_pwm_put() > e625fb70a6d21e4d pwm: core: Unify fwnode checks in the module > e5c38ba9f2813beb pwm: core: Reuse fwnode_to_pwmchip() in ACPI case > ca06616b1eed3112 pwm: core: Convert to use fwnode for matching > ad5e085c63f59391 pwm: Drop irrelevant error path from pwmchip_remove() > bcda91bf86c1ff76 pwm: Add a device-managed function to add PWM chips > 9e40ee18a1dc1623 pwm: core: Support new usage_power setting in PWM state > 69230cfac3d02c1b pwm: Autodetect default value for of_pwm_n_cells from > device tree > 5447e7833629ee42 pwm: Drop of_pwm_simple_xlate() in favour of > of_pwm_xlate_with_flags() > cf38c978cf1d2a28 pwm: Make of_pwm_xlate_with_flags() work with #pwm-cells = <2> I thought this was my command line, too, but *now* it shows some output. I'm unable to find out what I did wrong ... *shrug* I assume and hope Thierry is able to cope with that. Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
