Hi Bartosz,
On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 11:33 AM Bartosz Golaszewski
<bgolaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 12:59 PM Geert Uytterhoeven
> <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 12:33 PM Wolfram Sang
> > <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 12:13:43PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > > Document the compatible value for the ROHM Semiconductor BR24G01 I2C bus
> > > > EEPROM.
> > >
> > > What is the difference between those two? Could one also be the fallback
> > > of the other (just in the highly unlikely case we need "generic" Rohm
> > > handling somewhen)?
> >
> > Good question. The datasheets look similar.
> > Parametric search on rohm.com says the G-series differs in using
> > "Cu wire bonding".
>
> I'm fine with the current form as it's simpler than using two
> fallbacks. Do you want to submit another version anyway or can I pick
> it up?
If you're happy with it, then I'm happy, too ;-)
Thanks!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
