On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 12:59 PM Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Wolfram,
>
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 12:33 PM Wolfram Sang
> <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 12:13:43PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > Document the compatible value for the ROHM Semiconductor BR24G01 I2C bus
> > > EEPROM.
> >
> > What is the difference between those two? Could one also be the fallback
> > of the other (just in the highly unlikely case we need "generic" Rohm
> > handling somewhen)?
>
> Good question. The datasheets look similar.
> Parametric search on rohm.com says the G-series differs in using
> "Cu wire bonding".
>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
> Geert
>
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
> -- Linus Torvalds
I'm fine with the current form as it's simpler than using two
fallbacks. Do you want to submit another version anyway or can I pick
it up?
Bartosz
