> What I'm saying is... don't expect me to always review patches that > are for fixing code that other people have contributed - I wish those > who introduce regressions would stick around and attend to breakage > that they cause, instead of hoping that someone else will do that > for them. It's a reasonable ask. Yes, I am much with you here. > Thanks - I'll get around to it in due course. Since I'm no longer > supported as 32-bit ARM maintainer, I only apply patches once or maybe > twice per kernel release. Quite how long this will be sustainable for, > I've no idea (it depends whether I get any actual paying work, and > how much.) I didn't know that, thanks for the heads up. I understand that problem and hope there will be income for the work you do.