On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 02:02:40PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > Hi Russell, > > > Those who cause breakage really should be the ones to look at patches > > that fix their breakage. > > Does it mean you want an explicit ack from Thomas or that it should go > via his tree? What I'm saying is... don't expect me to always review patches that are for fixing code that other people have contributed - I wish those who introduce regressions would stick around and attend to breakage that they cause, instead of hoping that someone else will do that for them. It's a reasonable ask. > > The way patches get applied is if they end up in my patch system... if > > they don't make it there, they don't get applied. > > The patch itself is here: > > https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/viewpatch.php?id=9047/1 Thanks - I'll get around to it in due course. Since I'm no longer supported as 32-bit ARM maintainer, I only apply patches once or maybe twice per kernel release. Quite how long this will be sustainable for, I've no idea (it depends whether I get any actual paying work, and how much.) -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
