On Fri, 2020-12-11 at 20:27 +0900, Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote:
> Add support for BD9574MWF which is silimar chip with BD9571MWV.
> Note that BD9574MWF has an additional feature, but doesn't
> support it for now.
nit:
Perhaps mention which feature? And I think you mean the driver does not
support it yet?
>
> Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
FWIW:
Reviewed-By: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpio/gpio-bd9571mwv.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-bd9571mwv.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-
> bd9571mwv.c
> index 0e5395f..df6102b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-bd9571mwv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-bd9571mwv.c
> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
> // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> /*
> - * ROHM BD9571MWV-M GPIO driver
> + * ROHM BD9571MWV-M and BD9574MWF-M GPIO driver
> *
> * Copyright (C) 2017 Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
> *
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
> */
>
> #include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
> +#include <linux/mfd/rohm-generic.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>
> @@ -118,7 +119,8 @@ static int bd9571mwv_gpio_probe(struct
> platform_device *pdev)
> }
>
> static const struct platform_device_id bd9571mwv_gpio_id_table[] = {
> - { "bd9571mwv-gpio", },
> + { "bd9571mwv-gpio", ROHM_CHIP_TYPE_BD9571 },
> + { "bd9574mwf-gpio", ROHM_CHIP_TYPE_BD9574 },
I guess these CHIP_TYPES are used by subsequent patches?
I guess this means the existing functionality in both chips is same,
right? (GPIO register addresses etc? - I don't have BD9571 data-sheet
so I can't check)
> { /* sentinel */ }
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(platform, bd9571mwv_gpio_id_table);
