Re: [PATCH 0/3] Fixes for stop monitoring disabled devices series

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/07/2020 13:57, Andrzej Pietrasiewicz wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> W dniu 03.07.2020 o 13:06, Daniel Lezcano pisze:
>> On 03/07/2020 12:43, Andrzej Pietrasiewicz wrote:
>>> This short series contains fixes for "Stop monitoring disabled devices"
>>> series https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg817861.html
>>>
>>> Invocation of thermal_zone_device_is_enabled() in acpi/thermal is now
>>> redundant, because thermal_zone_device_update() now is capable of
>>> handling disabled devices.
>>>
>>> In imx's ->get_temp() the lock must not be taken, otherwise a deadlock
>>> happens. The decision whether explicitly running a measurement cycle
>>> is needed is taken based on driver's local irq_enabled variable.
>>>
>>> Finally, thermal_zone_device_is_enabled() is made available to the
>>> core only, as there are no driver users of it.
>>>
>>> Andrzej Pietrasiewicz (3):
>>>    acpi: thermal: Don't call thermal_zone_device_is_enabled()
>>>    thermal: imx: Use driver's local data to decide whether to run a
>>>      measurement
>>>    thermal: Make thermal_zone_device_is_enabled() available to core only
>>>
>>>   drivers/acpi/thermal.c         | 3 ---
>>>   drivers/thermal/imx_thermal.c  | 7 ++++---
>>>   drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c | 1 -
>>>   drivers/thermal/thermal_core.h | 2 ++
>>>   include/linux/thermal.h        | 5 -----
>>>   5 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
>> Is this series easily merge-able with the other series?
>>
> 
> So-so.
> 
> Some simple conflicts needed to be resolved.
> 
> I have created a branch for you to look at and decide
> how far off it is from the original and whether the
> original Acked-by/Reviewed-by can be retained.
> 
> Note that I might have lost some portions of code
> during conflict resolution. It seems to me I haven't
> but you know.
> 
> The branch:
> 
> https://gitlab.collabora.com/andrzej.p/kernel-tests/-/tree/thermal-dont-poll-disabled-for-daniel

Ok, I propose to keep the these three patches on top of V7.

Rui are you fine with that ?



-- 
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux