On Fri, May 01, 2020 at 10:42:06PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > On 4/28/20 10:32 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 02:31:47PM +0200, marek.vasut@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > >> From: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> The PHY initialization function pointer does not change during the > >> lifetime of the driver instance, it is therefore sufficient to get > >> the pointer in .probe(), cache it in driver private data, and just > >> call the function through the cached pointer in .resume(). > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> > >> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx> > >> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> > >> Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> Cc: linux-renesas-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> --- > >> NOTE: Based on git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lpieralisi/pci.git > >> branch pci/rcar > >> NOTE: The driver tag is now 'pcie-rcar' to distinguish it from pci-rcar-gen2.c > >> --- > >> drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rcar.c | 10 ++++------ > >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > > Squashed in https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11438665 > > Thanks > > > Do you want me to rename the $SUBJECT (and the branch name while at it) > > in the patches in my pci/rcar branch ("PCI: pcie-rcar: ...") to start > > the commit subject tag renaming from this cycle (and in the interim you > > send a rename for the drivers files ?) > > I don't really have a particular preference either way. I can keep > marking the drivers with pcie-rcar and pci-rcar tags if that helps > discern them. So: - "rcar" for the PCIe driver - "rcar-pci" or "rcar-legacy" for the pci-rcar-gen2.c (preference ? there is no urgency, no commit queued to rename, it is for future code) Are we OK with that ? If yes I will rewrite the commits subjects and push out an updated pci/rcar branch. ...DT bindings commit subjects - should I change their tag subject too ? Lorenzo
