On 4/28/20 10:32 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 02:31:47PM +0200, marek.vasut@xxxxxxxxx wrote: >> From: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> The PHY initialization function pointer does not change during the >> lifetime of the driver instance, it is therefore sufficient to get >> the pointer in .probe(), cache it in driver private data, and just >> call the function through the cached pointer in .resume(). >> >> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx> >> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: linux-renesas-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> --- >> NOTE: Based on git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lpieralisi/pci.git >> branch pci/rcar >> NOTE: The driver tag is now 'pcie-rcar' to distinguish it from pci-rcar-gen2.c >> --- >> drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rcar.c | 10 ++++------ >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > Squashed in https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11438665 Thanks > Do you want me to rename the $SUBJECT (and the branch name while at it) > in the patches in my pci/rcar branch ("PCI: pcie-rcar: ...") to start > the commit subject tag renaming from this cycle (and in the interim you > send a rename for the drivers files ?) I don't really have a particular preference either way. I can keep marking the drivers with pcie-rcar and pci-rcar tags if that helps discern them.
