On Thu, 19 Dec 2019 10:20:46 +0900, Kuninori Morimoto wrote: > > > Hi Sato-san, Rich > > These are strncpy() fixup patches, but using different solutions. > Karl's patches are updating current strncpy(), but using 2 patterns. > Kuninori's patch is using generic strncpy(). > > We don't know which is the best, but we can follow > SH maintainer's selection. > > Karl Nasrallah (2): > sh: fixup strncpy() warning and add missing padding > sh: fixup strncpy() warning and add missing padding > > Kuninori Morimoto (4): > sh: use generic strncpy() > > Thank you for your help !! > Best regards > --- > Kuninori Morimoto I think the generic version is better, but I want to decide after comparing what code is generated. If it is not very inefficient, I would like to make it a generic version. -- Yoshinori Sato
