Hi guys, > From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: 17 December 2019 13:54 > Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 06/13] drm/bridge: lvds-codec: Add "lvds-decoder" support > > Hello, > > On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 01:38:51PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 1:31 PM Fabrizio Castro wrote: > > > On 17 December 2019 12:21, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > >> On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 12:03 PM Fabrizio Castro wrote: > > >>> On 13 December 2019 17:11, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > >>>> On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 03:51:25PM +0000, Fabrizio Castro wrote: > > >>>>> Add support for transparent LVDS decoders by adding a new > > >>>>> compatible string ("lvds-decoder") to the driver. > > >>>>> This patch also adds member connector_type to struct lvds_codec, > > >>>>> and that's because LVDS decoders have a different connector type > > >>>>> from LVDS encoders. We fill this new member up with the data > > >>>>> matching the compatible string. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Signed-off-by: Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/lvds-codec.c > > >>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/lvds-codec.c > > >>>>> > > >>>>> @@ -65,6 +67,7 @@ static int lvds_codec_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > >>>>> if (!lvds_codec) > > >>>>> return -ENOMEM; > > >>>>> > > >>>>> + lvds_codec->connector_type = (u32)of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev); > > >>>> > > >>>> I'm now getting a compilation failure here: > > >>>> > > >>>> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/lvds-codec.c: In function ‘lvds_codec_probe’: > > >>>> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/lvds-codec.c:68:31: error: cast from pointer to integer of different size [-Werror=pointer-to-int-cast] > > >>>> lvds_codec->connector_type = (u32)of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev); > > >>>> ^ > > >>>> > > >>>> The fix should be simple: > > >>>> > > >>>> lvds_codec->connector_type = (uintptr_t)of_device_get_match_data(dev); > > >>>> > > >>>> I'm bothered by the fact that I've compiled this before without any > > >>>> issue, so this really puzzles me. Do you get the same warning ? > > >>> > > >>> The warning appears when compiling for arm64, understandably so. > > >>> We must have compiled this for arm only the first time around. > > >>> > > >>> I think the right way to solve this is to either cast to (u32)(uintptr_t) or (u32)(unsigned long). > > >> > > >> Just casting to uintptr_t should be sufficient. > > > > > > It should be sufficient for the compiler, but I have seen examples where people > > > preferred to be explicit, like in: > > > drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c > > > drivers/leds/leds-pm8058.c > > > > > > Since the kernel is increasing its tightness with respect to warnings, I personally prefer > > > (u32)(uintptr_t), even though not strictly necessary, but I am fine with (uintptr_t) if you > > > don't like (u32)(uintptr_t). > > > > It depends. I try to have as few casts as possible ("casts are evil"). > > > > While adding the extra (u32) cast makes it clearer that the intended > > result is a u32 (for now), it will cause silent truncation on 64-bit if > > connector_type is ever enlarged to unsigned long, and larger values are > > used. > > > > In this particular case this is unlikely, though, as unsigned long would > > still be 32-bit on 32-bit platforms, so the larger values cannot be > > used. > > I also try to add as few casts as possible, so (uintptr_t) would be my > preference. > > Fabrizio, could you submit a new version of this patch with the problem > fixed (and with the casts you decide to use, but using uintptr_t instead > of unsigned long in any case) ? Will send a new version tomorrow with (uintptr_t) Thanks, Fab > > -- > Regards, > > Laurent Pinchart