RE: [PATCH 04/12] usb: host: ehci-r8a77470: Add EHCI support for Renesas RZ/G1C devices

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Shimoda-San,

Thanks for the feedback.

> Subject: RE: [PATCH 04/12] usb: host: ehci-r8a77470: Add EHCI support for
> Renesas RZ/G1C devices
> 
> Hi Biju-san,
> 
> Thank you for the patch!
> 
> > From: Biju Das, Sent: Monday, April 1, 2019 9:54 PM
> <snip>
> > +/******* USB2.0 Host registers (original offset is +0x100) *******/
> > +#define USB2_INT_ENABLE			0x100
> > +#define USB2_SPD_RSM_TIMSET		0x20c
> > +#define USB2_OC_TIMSET			0x210
> > +
> > +#define USB2_INT_ENABLE_USBH_INTB_EN	BIT(2)
> > +#define USB2_INT_ENABLE_USBH_INTA_EN	BIT(1)
> > +#define USB2_INT_ENABLE_INIT
> 	(USB2_INT_ENABLE_USBH_INTB_EN | \
> > +					 USB2_INT_ENABLE_USBH_INTA_EN)
> > +
> > +#define USB2_SPD_RSM_TIMSET_INIT	0x014e029b
> > +#define USB2_OC_TIMSET_INIT		0x000209ab
> 
> I should have notice this codes at the previous patch though, I'm thinking we
> can reuse the R-Car Gen3 codes because these values are similar with the
> phy-rcar-gen3-usb2.c like below:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> /* INT_ENABLE */
> #define USB2_INT_ENABLE_UCOM_INTEN	BIT(3)
> #define USB2_INT_ENABLE_USBH_INTB_EN	BIT(2)
> #define USB2_INT_ENABLE_USBH_INTA_EN	BIT(1)
> #define USB2_INT_ENABLE_INIT
> 	(USB2_INT_ENABLE_UCOM_INTEN | \
> 					 USB2_INT_ENABLE_USBH_INTB_EN
> | \
> 					 USB2_INT_ENABLE_USBH_INTA_EN)
> <snip>
> /* SPD_RSM_TIMSET */
> #define USB2_SPD_RSM_TIMSET_INIT	0x014e029b
> 
> /* OC_TIMSET */
> #define USB2_OC_TIMSET_INIT		0x000209ab
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> If so, we can use ehci-platform.c and ohci-platform.c as-is. In this case, the
> "phy: renesas: phy-rcar-gen2: Add support for r8a77470" driver should be
> initialized at first to release PLLRESET. And then, the phy-rcar-gen3-usb2
> driver would be initialized as second step. I think we can set these resisters at
> phy_init timing because the following patch did so:
> 
>   https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10655855/
> 
> What do you think?

Good catch. This solution will avoid overlapping regions as mentioned by Rob in the below patch and  also will avoid modifying ehci-platform.c  as suggested by Alen. 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10655853/

I will send V3 based on this solution. Please let me know, if you think otherwise.

Regards,
Biju






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux