On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 04:30:29AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Simon, > > On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 09:10:42AM +0200, Simon Horman wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 01:59:53PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 12:25 PM Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 12:59:20PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > >>> On Thursday, 6 September 2018 12:42:32 EEST Simon Horman wrote: > > >>>> On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 11:58:54AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > >>>>> On Sun, Aug 19, 2018 at 9:44 PM Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > >>>>>> The Salvator-X and XS boards have a 4 lines DIP switch and 3 push > > >>>>>> buttons connected to SoC GPIOs, meant to be used as general-purpose test > > >>>>>> keys. Add a corresponding node in DT, mapping (semi-randomly) the DIP > > >>>>>> switch to keys 1-4 and the push buttons to keys A-C. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart > > >>>>>> <laurent.pinchart+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Given GP6_1[123] are not just wired to the 3 push buttons, but also to 3 > > >>>>> LEDs, I wonder if we shouldn't postpone that part until Linux can handle > > >>>>> GPIOs connected to both? > > >>>> > > >>>> Laurent, any thoughts on that? > > >>> > > >>> Right now the GPIOs are not wired in DT, and we're thus without a way to > > >>> interface to both LEDs and push buttons. While I agree that an ideal > > >>> solution would be to support both, I think that moving from nothing to > > >>> support for push buttons would be a step forward already. > > >> > > >> I tend to agree. Geert, what are your thoughts? > > > > > > Fine for me. > > > > > > Just one more bikeshedding question: what's most useful, buttons or LEDs? ;-) > > > > Lets go with the buttons. > > > > Applied for v4.20. > > Shouldn't it have made it to Linus' tree then ? :-) Sorry about that, it seems that I didn't apply it after all. I have done so now.
