Re: renesas-drivers-2018-12-26-v4.20

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Shimoda-san,

Thanks for the report!

CC Will (commit author), Arnd (compiler collective).

On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 2:58 AM Yoshihiro Shimoda
<yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > From: Geert Uytterhoeven, Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2018 8:06 PM
> > I have pushed renesas-drivers-2018-12-26-v4.20 to
> > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/geert/renesas-drivers.git
> >
> > This tree is meant to ease development of platform support and drivers
> > for Renesas ARM SoCs. It is created by merging (a) the for-next branches
> > of various subsystem trees and (b) branches with driver code submitted
> > or planned for submission to maintainers into the development branch of
> > Simon Horman's renesas.git tree.
> >
> > Today's version is based on renesas-devel-20181220-v4.20-rc7.
>
> I built this version with "gcc version 5.2.1 20151005 (Linaro GCC 5.2-2015.11-1)",
> and then the following build error happened:
>
>   AS      arch/arm64/kernel/head.o
> /home/shimoda/development/renesas/renesas-drivers/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S: Assembler messages:
> /home/shimoda/development/renesas/renesas-drivers/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S:824: Error: missing ')'
> /home/shimoda/development/renesas/renesas-drivers/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S:824: Error: missing ')'
> /home/shimoda/development/renesas/renesas-drivers/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S:824: Error: missing ')'
> /home/shimoda/development/renesas/renesas-drivers/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S:824: Error: unexpected characters following instruction at operand 2 -- `mov x2,#(2)|(2U<<(8))'
>
> This error seems to cause the commit 66f16a24512f ("arm64: smp: Rework early feature mismatched detection").
> And if I modified the code as following, the build error disappeared:
>
> ---
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h
> index 18955618..e9b9cee 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h
> @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
>  #define CPU_PANIC_KERNEL               (3)
>
>  #define CPU_STUCK_REASON_52_BIT_VA     (1U << CPU_STUCK_REASON_SHIFT)
> -#define CPU_STUCK_REASON_NO_GRAN       (2U << CPU_STUCK_REASON_SHIFT)
> +#define CPU_STUCK_REASON_NO_GRAN       (UL(2) << CPU_STUCK_REASON_SHIFT)
>
>  #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> ---
>
> So, I think we have to fix this, but what do you think?
> # I don't know why the line 812 doesn't cause the build error,
> # but the line 824 causes the build error though...

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux