Hi Marek, On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 8:07 PM Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 12/15/2018 07:54 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 7:49 PM Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On 12/15/2018 07:47 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > >>> On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 7:38 PM Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>> On 12/15/2018 06:23 PM, Eduardo Valentin wrote: > >>>>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 02:49:22AM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: > >>>>>> Introduce new thermal_zone_of_sensor_register_params() function, which > >>>>>> allows passing struct thermal_zone_params into it and convert original > >>>>>> thermal_zone_of_sensor_register() to call it with params set to NULL. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> > >>>>> > >>>>> Git complains about mismatch between From: and this SOB. > >>>> > >>>> I recall a discussion about gmail stripping the +foo tags from email > >>>> addresses. I can add a From: tag into the patch to override this > >>>> braindeath, or is there a better solution ? > >>> > >>> Run the "git format-patch" command from a git repo where user.email > >>> is marek.vasut@xxxxxxxxx, so it will retain the original From: tag in the > >>> email body, as it is different? > >> > >> I can also manually patch the From tags or add them, but it's all > >> workarounds. > > > > Use a different outgoing email server? I use my ISP's. > > Or maybe it'd make sense to fix git to handle the +tags correctly ? What needs to be fixed? If user.email != From, git format-patch generates a From: header, else it doesn't. Doesn't that make sense? Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds