Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: dts: r7s9210: Initial SoC device tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 12:04:57PM +0000, Chris Brandt wrote:
> Hi Simon,
> 
> 
> On Friday, November 30, 2018, Simon Horman wrote:
> > > +	cpg: clock-controller@fcfe0020 {
> > > +		compatible = "renesas,r7s9210-cpg-mssr";
> > > +		reg = <0xfcfe0010 0x455>;
> > 
> > There is a discrepancy here between the base address, fcfe0020
> > and the start address of the register range, 0xfcfe0010.
> 
> Good catch! Thank you.
> 
> 
> > > +	ostm0: timer@e803b000 {
> > > +		compatible = "renesas,r7s9210-ostm", "renesas,ostm";
> > > +		reg = <0xe803b000 0x30>;
> > 
> > 
> > Its not clear to me why the size of the register range is 0x30.
> 
> Because when reviewing the bindings docs, I was putting in 'exact' 
> values, but Geert said "those are ugly, just round up to make it look
> nicer".
> So instead of 0x21, I put 0x30.
> 
> You know...the standard answer: Throw Geert under the bus ;)

Lets leave 0x30 :)



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux