On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 11:56:43AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Simon, > > On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 5:40 PM Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 03:54:55PM +0200, Simon Horman wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 10:55:07AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > > For consistency with other vendors, which have a single Kconfig symbol > > > > in arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > Note that drivers/clk/ is included before drivers/soc/. Hence when > > > > COMPILE_TEST=y, questions will be asked about clock drivers before they > > > > can be auto-selected by SoC support. > > > > > > > > Question: Should we introduce a family-specific Kconfig symbol for R-Car > > > > Gen3 (ARCH_RCAR_GEN1), which could be used for enabling > > > > > > s/1/3/? > > Sure. > > > > > > > > > RST_RCAR? > > > > > > Given that it would be consistent with R-Car Gen 1 and 2, > > > that seems like a good idea to me. > > > > there has been no other feedback on this series. > > How would you like to proceed? > > I will add a new symbol ARCH_RCAR_GEN3 for v2? Good plan. > Any comments about PATCH 2/2? Thanks, I have now commented.
