Hi Simon,
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 5:40 PM Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 03:54:55PM +0200, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 10:55:07AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > For consistency with other vendors, which have a single Kconfig symbol
> > > in arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > Note that drivers/clk/ is included before drivers/soc/. Hence when
> > > COMPILE_TEST=y, questions will be asked about clock drivers before they
> > > can be auto-selected by SoC support.
> > >
> > > Question: Should we introduce a family-specific Kconfig symbol for R-Car
> > > Gen3 (ARCH_RCAR_GEN1), which could be used for enabling
> >
> > s/1/3/?
Sure.
> > >
> > > RST_RCAR?
> >
> > Given that it would be consistent with R-Car Gen 1 and 2,
> > that seems like a good idea to me.
>
> there has been no other feedback on this series.
> How would you like to proceed?
I will add a new symbol ARCH_RCAR_GEN3 for v2?
Any comments about PATCH 2/2?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
