Hi Sergei,
On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 8:04 PM Sergei Shtylyov
<sergei.shtylyov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 10/08/2018 07:40 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >>>> Describe THS/CIVM in the R8A77970 device trees.
> >>>> Based on the original (and large) patches by Vladimir Barinov.
> >>>> + 0 0xe6190100 0 0x38>;
> >>>
> >>> What about the CIVM status register? DT describes hardware, not driver
> >>> limitations.
> >>
> >> I wasn't sure whether to put it into a separate "reg" tuple (which would confuse
> >> the driver) or not. After looking into the manual again, I'm going to extend the
> >> 2nd "reg" tuple...
> >
> > The CIVM Status Register indicates the chip internal voltage.
> > As such it's not a per-channel property, and IMHO doesn't belong in the second
> > tuple
>
> I was looking a the block diagrams (both in the chapters 10A and 10B) and I got a totally different impression...
I stand corrected. So extending the second reg block is fine.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
