Hi Geert, Laurent, On 10 September 2018 10:42 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 9:49 AM Linus Walleij wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 11:59 AM Phil Edworthy wrote: > > > On 05 September 2018 10:37, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > > > > Have the VxWorks DT bindings been submitted for review to the > > > > devicetree mailing list? > > > > > I'm not involved with the VxWorks port, but I am pretty sure that > > > they have not been submitted for review. > > > > We have had other cases where deployments on other OSes have been > > establishing bindings (even not very pretty ones). > > > > Examples include typically the Power MacIntosh and the original SPARC > > bindings. > > Which predated FDT support in Linux by more than a decade, with the latter > predating even p1275? > > While I see merit in compatibility with other existing OSes, I prefer not to > deviate from standard DT bindings, if they exist. > > Over time, we've even migrated from Renesas-specific DT bindings to > standard DT bindings, in already upstreamed SoC support. > > If needed, I guess a script can be written to convert DTS files from the old to > the new syntax? Thanks for your comments, that is also my preference. Since I have to juggle effort vs. features I thought it best to send the driver with existing out-of-tree bindings first just to see. I'll modify the driver for the standard bindings. Thanks Phil
