On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 11:45:52AM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hello Nguyen An,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Friday, 24 August 2018 07:52:28 EEST Nguyen An Hoan wrote:
> > From: Hoan Nguyen An <na-hoan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> You're missing a commit message. I agree that for simple patches like this one
> the subject line often contains enough information, but adding a commit
> message is still a good practice that we try to enforce through the kernel.
> For instance, looking at git history for r8a7796, you could use
>
> "The r8a77965 has a single FDP1 instance."
>
> > Signed-off-by: Hoan Nguyen An <na-hoan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Apart from that,
>
> Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Simon, could you update the commit message when taking this patch in your
> tree, to avoid the need for a v2 ?
Yes, can do.
Can I confirm that it is safe, from a regression point of view,
to apply this patch without patch 2/2?
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a77965.dtsi | 10 ++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a77965.dtsi
> > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a77965.dtsi index 9c4f405..bef519f 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a77965.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a77965.dtsi
> > @@ -1578,6 +1578,16 @@
> > status = "disabled";
> > };
> >
> > + fdp1@fe940000 {
> > + compatible = "renesas,fdp1";
> > + reg = <0 0xfe940000 0 0x2400>;
> > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 262 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > + clocks = <&cpg CPG_MOD 119>;
> > + power-domains = <&sysc R8A77965_PD_A3VP>;
> > + resets = <&cpg 119>;
> > + renesas,fcp = <&fcpf0>;
> > + };
> > +
> > fcpf0: fcp@fe950000 {
> > compatible = "renesas,fcpf";
> > reg = <0 0xfe950000 0 0x200>;
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Laurent Pinchart
>
>
>
