Hi Ulrich,
Thank you for the patch.
On Tuesday, 14 August 2018 16:49:55 EEST Ulrich Hecht wrote:
> From: Koji Matsuoka <koji.matsuoka.xm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Signed-off-by: Koji Matsuoka <koji.matsuoka.xm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_crtc.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_crtc.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_crtc.c index b52b3e8..cd6803a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_crtc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_crtc.c
> @@ -229,6 +229,7 @@ static void rcar_du_crtc_set_display_timing(struct
> rcar_du_crtc *rcrtc) unsigned long rate;
> u32 extdiv;
>
> + clk_set_rate(rcrtc->extclock, mode_clock);
This is a hack, Jacopo has posted "[PATCH 3/3] drm: rcar-du: Improve non-DPLL
clock selection" which I think is a better solution (or will be in v2 :-)).
> extclk = clk_get_rate(rcrtc->extclock);
> if (rcdu->info->dpll_ch & (1 << rcrtc->index)) {
> unsigned long target = mode_clock;
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
