On 06/08/2018 08:37 AM, Lee Jones wrote: > On Thu, 07 Jun 2018, Marek Vasut wrote: > >> On 06/07/2018 02:41 PM, Lee Jones wrote: >>> On Thu, 07 Jun 2018, Marek Vasut wrote: >>> >>>> On 06/06/2018 11:59 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: >>>>> Use devm_regmap_add_irq_chip() instead of plain regmap_add_irq_chip(), >>>>> which removes the need for da9063_irq_exit() altogether and also >>>>> fixes a bug in da9063_device_init() where the da9063_irq_exit() was >>>>> not called in a failpath. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>> Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> Cc: Steve Twiss <stwiss.opensource@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> Cc: linux-renesas-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>> >>>> So it's just this one patch that's missing AB/RB and the series should >>>> be good? >>> >>> Looks fine. Although we'll let it sit for a while in case anyone else >>> has any thoughts. >> >> Fine by me. >> >>> The merge window is currently open, so there is no rush to apply. >> >> This is still 4.18 material ? Hum, OK. > > You mean this could be added to v4.18? If so, not a chance. I > normally cut off accepting trivial patches at around -rc6(ish). Large > sets like this require a longer soak in -next for all of the build > bots and testers to have their wicked way with them and for potential > merge conflicts to show. Fine -- Best regards, Marek Vasut
