On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 04:12:23PM +0300, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote: > On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 12:04 PM, Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 11:01:57AM +0300, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote: > >> On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 10:43 AM, Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 04:50:44PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > >> >> Hi Gilad, > >> >> > >> >> On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 2:29 PM, Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> >> > Add bindings for CryptoCell instance in the SoC. > >> >> > > >> >> > Signed-off-by: Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> >> > >> >> Thanks for your patch! > >> >> > >> >> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7795.dtsi > >> >> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7795.dtsi > >> >> > @@ -528,6 +528,14 @@ > >> >> > status = "disabled"; > >> >> > }; > >> >> > > >> >> > + arm_cc630p: crypto@e6601000 { > >> >> > + compatible = "arm,cryptocell-630p-ree"; > >> >> > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 71 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; > >> >> > + #interrupt-cells = <2>; > >> >> > >> >> I believe the #interrupt-cells property is not needed. > >> >> > >> >> > + reg = <0x0 0xe6601000 0 0x1000>; > >> >> > + clocks = <&cpg CPG_MOD 229>; > >> >> > + }; > >> >> > >> >> The rest looks good, but I cannot verify the register block. > >> >> > >> >> > + > >> >> > i2c3: i2c@e66d0000 { > >> >> > #address-cells = <1>; > >> >> > #size-cells = <0>; > >> > > >> > Thanks, I have applied this after dropping the #interrupt-cells property. > >> > >> Thanks you! > >> > >> Alas, it will not work without the clk patch (the previous one in the > >> series) so they need to be > >> taken or dropped together. > > > > I think its fine if it does not yet work. > > But not if its causes things that previously worked to stop working. > > Based on the further discussion with Geert my recommendation is to > drop my patch for now, > take Geert CR clock patch and I will follow up next week with a v2 > that fixes the clock > handing as discussed with Geert. Thanks, I will drop the patch.