On 5/17/2018 2:32 AM, Niklas Söderlund wrote:
The style for referring to ports and endpoint are wrong. Refer to them
using lowercase and a unit address, port@x and endpoint@x.
Signed-off-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
More typos, yay! :-)
---
.../devicetree/bindings/media/rcar_vin.txt | 20 +++++++++----------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/rcar_vin.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/rcar_vin.txt
index c2c57dcf73f4851b..a574b9c037c05a3c 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/rcar_vin.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/rcar_vin.txt
@@ -45,23 +45,23 @@ The per-board settings Gen2 platforms:
The per-board settings Gen3 platforms:
Gen3 platforms can support both a single connected parallel input source
-from external SoC pins (port0) and/or multiple parallel input sources
-from local SoC CSI-2 receivers (port1) depending on SoC.
+from external SoC pins (port@0) and/or multiple parallel input sources
+from local SoC CSI-2 receivers (port@1) depending on SoC.
- renesas,id - ID number of the VIN, VINx in the documentation.
- ports
- - port 0 - sub-node describing a single endpoint connected to the VIN
+ - port@0 - sub-node describing a single endpoint connected to the VIN
from external SoC pins described in video-interfaces.txt[1].
- Describing more then one endpoint in port 0 is invalid. Only VIN
- instances that are connected to external pins should have port 0.
- - port 1 - sub-nodes describing one or more endpoints connected to
+ Describing more then one endpoint in port@0 is invalid. Only VIN
s/then/than/.
+ instances that are connected to external pins should have port@0.
+ - port@1 - sub-nodes describing one or more endpoints connected to
the VIN from local SoC CSI-2 receivers. The endpoint numbers must
use the following schema.
[...]
MBR, Sergei
